
subscribe to the Century
|
Reply to |
Author |
Comment Title |
Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hell | Bob Cornwall | Gordon, This is a most |
Gordon, This is a most interesting challenge, and as others have pointed out, fraught with danger. I won't be participating in the study, because I long ago gave up the idea -- it might have it's play in Scripture but didn't seem to fit the nature of God. So, I gave it up long before I became a liberal! While I was still a student at Fuller. Still, I've never figured out the attraction of the doctrine! |
| Hell | Real Live Preacher | I got a lot of response. I'm |
I got a lot of response. I'm on retreat this week. Will collate and try to summarize and report next week. thanks John. |
| Hell | Marvin (not verified) | I preached a sermon on hell |
I preached a sermon on hell recently. The parable of the wheat and the tares was my text: http://marvinlindsay.typepad.com/avdat/2008/07/no-till-farming.html But I'm not down with the three criteria. Sorry if this is off-topic. |
| Hell | Sam (not verified) | I'm not ready to tackle hell |
I'm not ready to tackle hell right now. Maybe next year when I do an extended study of the Reformed theological heritage (in honor of Calvin's 500 year jubilee). But one thing I am continually forced to deal with (and find my own theology challenged by) is the complete lack of belief in any kind of an afterlife. It's just not something mainliners are comfortable with in Southern California... even at memorial services. I suspect that several things are involved, but I think the 2 most important are: 1. Universalism, i.e. nobody's going to hell because there's no such place... so why talk about heaven? 2. Denial of death: With facelifts, work-outs, hair transplants, and converibles, we are encouraged to live our lives as though we're eternally 29. Since we deny that we ourselves are getting older, we fail to appreciate the wisdom that comes with age, thriving instead on perpetual innovation. And if we refuse to think about the blessing of age, then the end of life and what happens after we die are simply pushed from the agenda as something we no longer have time for. Is the rest of the country like this yet? If not, then perhaps the you should all start getting ready. Remember Proposition 13? What starts in California generally spreads. |
| Hell | John Hamilton | Gordon, I keep checking to |
Gordon, I keep checking to see what fruit this tree is bearing, and whether it's good or bad fruit. I'm also aware that my beliefs about hell are not simply what the Bible says. One, because I don't speak Greek. Two, because the issues of metaphorical language, and how much Jesus used language without necessarily buying into it cloud the biblical witness. I know some people will write this off who read it: I believe in hell because I've experienced it in relationships (Camus was right as well as wrong when he said "Hell is other people.") and in consequences of my choices. Have you run down the list of texts that accompany the article in New Hampshire Confession of Faith and others? I guess I also believe in hell or rather the awayness of God because I believe if you don't have a choice, it's not love. And we gotta be honest: if there's no hell, there may be no heaven. Anyway, I'll keep checking. Hope you get a lot of good grist for something. |
| Hell | Real Live Preacher | I've had some fundamentalists |
I've had some fundamentalists put me in their sights before. They have no power over me since I don't make a lot of money and am not clinging to a pulpit somewhere worried about getting fired. What can they do but send nasty emails? I'm just saying. that said, it's no fun. I had a guy who was convinced I was an anti-Christ and a false prophet once. He plagued the comments and sent me a lot of email. I finally just deleted everything he did until he went away. I don't see that happening so much now. Too many crazy liberal bloggers out there for someone to attach themselves to just me. |
| Hell | Real Live Preacher | Yeah well, I often regret my |
Yeah well, I often regret my actions. ;-) But the responses have been very polite and nice and respectful. This is good...I think. |
| Hell | Page (not verified) | Well, I do appreciate your |
Well, I do appreciate your reply. It clarified an important focus that I missed on my first reading. I was reared in a similar tradition some 50 plus years ago. What I have learned along the way is that what we believe is based on our experiences (relational and scriptural) which create certain assumptions (which we often do not recognize or think about) which leads to our having conversations about biblical/theological sharings (witnesses) that may or may not come out of similar experiences and similar understandings of those experiences. Perhaps you and your brother and sister evangelicals have similar experiences and understandings of those experiences. Yet, if I believe what I read in scripture of how those writers sought to understand and express their encounter with God's mystery of faith and redemption and how they often expressed different understandings of similar experiences then I would want to hear of those underlying experiences to know that there is commmon understanding that would lead to dialogue. Truth is a word that has become for me not an intellectual matter but a matter of my faith relationship with God and my faithfulness to that relationship as the Spirit nurtures and nourishes it. I pray for you God's grace in receiving answers to your question and in your conversations with your evangelical brothers and sisters. Grace and Peace, |
| Hell | Real Live Preacher | In this case I'm not trying |
In this case I'm not trying to get at anything close to such a big truth. I'm simply asking a group of people to explain their beliefs according to their own methods. I want to know why my brother and sister evangelicals believe what they believe about hell. This is my spiritual family. Why do we believe these things? I've only asked them to show me their scriptures. And I've only asked that if they cannot, they spend a little time asking themselves what that means. |
| Hell | Thom Turner | I am curious what kind of |
I am curious what kind of arguments will surface. And a bit scared for some random fundamentalist (of either pole) to declare war against you. Would it be good to give some examples of well thought arguments from different theologians, such as from the book Four Views on Hell? That might help people frame their arguments intelligibly and respectfully. God bless you for taking this upon yourself; I agree it's high time this got out in the open. |
| Hell | Larry Vaughan | Gordon, You are a brave soul. |
Gordon, |
| Hell | Page (not verified) | What I DO NOT see spelled out |
What I DO NOT see spelled out in our writing are the assumptions that are necessary to interpret the use of scripture, the use of the word "hell", the claim of something being a "tradition", the understanding of the nature of God, and the understanding of the authority of scripture. No conversation can be conducted without the delineation of such assumptions by you or anyone else. Without assumptions we have monologues that try to be dialogues, but end up leading to neither party hearing, much less understanding, the other. This too often ends in labeling (name calling) and all kinds of intellectual gymnatics. The worse part is it leaves no room for reconciliation, since the object of such discussion without owning assumptions is win - lose. One of my assumptions is that what we have is WITNESS to what God, hopefully, has given us to understand about the Gospel (see Romans 12:3ff). Our witness must be joined with the witness of others in order to have a glimpse of the truth of God's Word and words. I'll leave my response with this asumption about God: God sees us not through human eyes nor by human standards and we are called to have the same sight through Jesus the Christ (see II Cor. 5:16ff.). |
|
Reply to |
Author |
Comment Title |
Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Welcome New CCbloggers | David Cramer | Thanks for the opportunity to |
Thanks for the opportunity to join this network. Looking forward to be a part. And, welcome to all the other newcomers! DC |
|
Reply to |
Author |
Comment Title |
Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| James Dobson misrepresents Barack Obama’s views on religion | Ray Reavis (not verified) | You said: "Obama is clearly a |
You said: then: I'm not on anyone's team here, but I find it ironic that you critize Dobson for making a judgment of Obama's faith, then go on to make a comparitive judgment between how serious of a Christian Obama and McCain are. I'm not sure exactly how one would go about judging how serious of a Christian someone is. Peace, |
|
Reply to |
Author |
Comment Title |
Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| The cost of togetherness | Larry Vaughan | Milton, "And togetherness is |
Milton, |
| The cost of togetherness | Milton Brasher-... | John Vocabulary is a powerful |
John Vocabulary is a powerful tool. When we look of those trapped in poverty as not simply the victims of misfortune but as victims of violence, it changes the picture. Thanks. Peace, |
| The cost of togetherness | Milton Brasher-... | Gordon, When we lived in |
Gordon, When we lived in Boston and encountered homeless people all the time, our boundary was to give them food, but not money. I asked a guy one day if he wanted a cup of coffee and a muffin and he said, "Coke and a brownie?" When I went into the coffee shop to get his food, it looked so good I got one for me, too, and we sat on the curb and ate our treats together. I don't think we can think of community as an option. Life and faith are both team sports, which means there is a certain, "You, again?" component that is difficult to live with. And we have to live with it. Thinking about the woman you mentioned, what struck me is we are just now coming up on three years since Katrina and, as I'm sure you remember from your CPE days, a healthy grief process takes anywhere from eighteen months to three years. I wonder how much of her childishness is grief? Peace, |
| The cost of togetherness | John Hamilton | Hey, Milton, thanks for |
Hey, Milton, thanks for wrestling with this. Where the rubber hits the road for me is not at $20M but considerably less. Yeah, lots of people make more than my family. But, the hard truth is, lots of people make less, way way less if you start counting people in other countries. I read in the Bible that when the people gathered manna, no one had too much, no one had too little. Clearly communism doesn't work, the example of the early church notwithstanding. But, seeing that $200,000 or $200M is not enough, we're discovering the flaws in capitalism, too. Gandhi said, Poverty is the worst form of violence. Maybe we need cadres of Jesus followers who seek not only to live in peace but also to live as simply as possible, lest they consume that which belongs to others. Anyway, thanks for your thoughts. |
| The cost of togetherness | RJ (not verified) | Thanks for your words about |
Thanks for your words about baseball, Manny, community and the contradictions that pay some millions and throw others out to fend form themselves on our mean streets. I remember Manny from the early days back in Cleveland when I was doing urban ministry on the near West Side and my youngest daughter served him ice cream at a stand downtown. He was shy and humble back then - a damn fine ball player - but he had no idea he would be worth 20 million dollars. We still have the ball he autographed back in the humble days. I am sorry he is gone... but I am sad and angry that so many of our friends sleep under bridges or on cots in churches. A former food bank manager said it best back in Tucson: We used to be a nation that was ashamed to have soup kitchens back in the 30s - now we are proud of them - and the government depends upon them as part of the unfunded social safety net. We got it wrong because instead of spending all that time and money gleaning and creating distribution places for hand outs, we should have been fighting for jobs and housing and mental health treatment. Man, was he ever right... |
| The cost of togetherness | Real Live Preacher | The problem with communities |
The problem with communities is, of course, that they are filled with people. This is some kind of cosmic joke or maybe the whole thing will turn out to have been a kind of spiritual boot camp. Nothing is ever the way it should be. We get quiet in church and some child will start acting up. You can take the children out of worship, but that spoils things in a different way. You get a community going and then someone leaves for a silly reason and takes their marbles with them. Or the intimacy finally brings a hidden conflict to the surface between two people who were doing okay until they started sharing meals and sharing a lawnmower. We have a woman in our church - a Katrina survivor - who is just determined to always be poor. Nothing good can happen that she can't sabotage, not windfall arrives that she can't spend on DVDs only to be out of money at the end of the month. When Jesus said the poor will always be with us, he said a mouthful. What is our community to this person? She can never take her place as a full member of the community because she sees herself as a child. So, we let her be a child. We don't enable. We let her struggle, helping out now and again. We give rides to church but no money that she can spend poorly. We give her occasional food vouchers and rides to the doctor, but not rides everywhere. We limp along. That's the best community can be this side of heaven, I'm afraid. Community is a great idea, like finally gathering together in Jerusalem next year. And like the mythical Jerusalem gathering, it just never quite happens. But still we believe. Still we hope. |
|
Reply to |
Author |
Comment Title |
Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Something old, something new | Jan Richardson | So glad you got to see the |
So glad you got to see the exhibition. Amazing to see the pages up close, and in a place that's been so integral to their creation. Thanks! |
| Something old, something new | Jan Richardson | Thanks, Adam. I have a friend |
Thanks, Adam. I have a friend who uses only hand tools when he's woodworking; he loves the simplicity and discipline of it. Though it stirs a remembrance of something I recently heard someone say: "It's not always simple to be simple"-! There's something to be said for a good power tool once in a while... But so good to have the luxury of slowing down when we can, and being more intimately connected with what we're creating. |
| Something old, something new | Jan Richardson | Thanks, Thom. Hm, just |
Thanks, Thom. Hm, just peanuts in peanut butter? Radical. As I write this, I'm sitting in the dining room at The Grünewald Guild, where a couple of women are in the kitchen, washing great fistfuls of beets that they had just picked from the Guild's garden. One of the things I love best about being here at the Guild is being fed, with much of the fare coming from the garden--real food, definitely not food products. (And there's always a bowl of organic peanut butter out, though I confess I have to periodically get my Jif fix.) |
| Something old, something new | Jan Richardson | Thanks, Gordon. I had the |
Thanks, Gordon. I had the stories of the anointing women on my mind while I was writing this post, as I often do when I see lavishness poured out in a way that some folks see as wasteful. I love the question that Macrina Wiederkehr poses as she reflects on one of these anointing stories in her book A Tree Full of Angels; she asks the reader, "What are you wasting on Jesus?" I'm at the beginning of my second week at The Grünewald Guild, a wondrous retreat center in Washington State that focuses on faith and the arts. Being here is always an amazing experience of being immersed in a creative community that oozes such holy extravagance. |
|
Reply to |
Author |
Comment Title |
Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Around the network | administrator | I wanted to comment on David |
I wanted to comment on David Helms blog about marriage but he has locked the comments there. Briefly I just wanted to share the guts of a conversation I had with a great pastor friend of mine on their very subject. Actually it was a bit tangential, it was in relation to remarriage of divorcees in the light of Mathews explanation from Jesus about this. However the principle he gave me in the answer covers both scenarios. |