Christian Century:
An intellectually compelling look at our faith

subscribe to the Century
I have begun a study of the what the Bible has to say about hell. I’ve read all four gospels and written down every passage that seems relevant. I have looked up every reference to “hell” and “hades” in the New Testament and read them. I’ve read the book of Revelation to see what it has to say. And I’ve looked up some other passages. My intent is to continue studying the rest of the New Testament until I feel I know everything it has to say about hell.
Maybe you can help me. I want to know why you believe what you believe about hell.
Hell was a serious part of the religious tradition I was raised in - evangelical Christianity. It was just part of the deal. You either believed in hell or you were some kind of liberal who was just too much of a boo-hoo crybaby to accept hard Biblical truths. As a liberal, it was said that you trusted your heart and your feelings more than holy scripture. And that was said to be a very bad thing, because once you start letting your own ideas and feelings determine your beliefs, you’ve basically invented your own religion.
Now there are three basic components to what might be called the traditional view of hell. And you have to believe in all three of them to hold that traditional view.
First, and somewhat obviously, you have to believe that hell is real. There has to be a literal hell, a place where certain people go to be punished. There are two schools of thought among those who believe in a literal hell. There are the actual flames and brimstone people, who believe sinners will be burned slowly and excruciatingly in hell. This is an unthinkably horrible notion, but they believe that’s what the Bible says, so they have to accept it no matter how terrible it is. And there are the “it’s probably just some kind of sad and lonely separation from God” people. The people who believe in flames tend to look down on the separation from God people, who seem a little liberal. Not liberal enough to reject the whole idea of hell, but certainly liberal enough to be suspect.
Second, you have to believe that non-Christians are the ones who are headed for hell. It is often a little surprising when people find out that in traditional evangelical theology, it is not bad people who will go to hell. Hell will be filled with people who did not become Christians. And this is true even if they never heard of Christianity. Yes, it is believed that even a young woman raised in a primitive culture in an isolated jungle will go to hell if she dies without becoming a Christian. That’s why we have to get missionaries over there, chop chop. To save her and others like her. True, our arrival will destroy her delicate culture and expose her people to deadly diseases and other Western things that will undoubtedly be harmful, but all other concerns pale when compared to eternal torment, do they not?
Third, to have a traditional belief in hell, you have to believe that hell is eternal. That’s what hell-believing Christians say. Once you go to hell, it’s forever and ever and ever and ever and ever. Forever. And ever. Planets will be born and die while you are in hell. Solar systems will spin into and out of existence. Galaxies will slowly grind through each other and twist outward into the expanding universe. And there you will be, hopefully just bored out of your skull, but if those who believe in literal flames are right...well, I don’t even know how to think about something like that.
Evangelicals have no way around this horror. Catholics invented the idea of Purgatory, which is not found anywhere in the Bible. It is a temporary place of punishment. If, as Robin Williams said, you had to smoke a turd in Purgatory for 1000 years, that would be awful, but at least there would be an end in sight. Evangelicals, who claim to limit themselves to what’s in the Bible, do not have such an easy out.
So that’s hell in a nutshell. That’s what we were taught. It is a literal place where you are sent. You are sent there for not being a Christian. And once you are condemned to hell, it is forever. There are no second chances.
Now let’s make a turn and talk about something else. One thing is for sure - you wouldn’t believe in hell unless the Bible was so clear about it that you were left with no choice. No one really WANTS there to be a hell, right? Please tell me no one wants hell to be real. Because if you are the sort of person who likes the idea of hell, you might be the devil yourself. While conservative seminarians discuss whether or not the devil exists, liberal seminarians are discussing whether or not you really exist.
If you ask me, a person would have to be pretty sure of himself before he would tell people they were going to hell. If you say that hell exists, and it is for non-Christians, and it is fire, and it is forever, you better be sure of yourself. Because I can’t imagine a worse blasphemy if it’s not true. That would really make God angry, wouldn’t you think? You running around and ruining God’s reputation like that.
It’s funny - hell Christians always act like we who don’t think everyone is going to burn in hell are the ones taking a chance. “Uh oh, you’re getting liberal. Aren’t you afraid God is going to be really mad at you for not believing in hell?” Well, maybe. Maybe I’ll smoke a turd in some back closet of heaven for being too nice. But if you’re wrong, you and people like you have trashed God’s reputation for 2,000 years.
I think I’ll take my chances with the liberals.
THE CHALLENGE:
Okay, so here's the deal: if you believe in hell, I want you to help us understand why. I invite anyone who believes that non-Christians are going to an eternal hell to make your case. We’re going to play by your rules too. Bible arguments only. Don’t explain why you think there should be a hell. Don’t tell us that your preacher told you there is a hell. Show us in the scriptures you say you love so dearly.
Because if you’re talking about hell, you better damn well be able to open your holy book and show us why. And if you can’t...well, maybe you shouldn’t be talking so much.
THE GROUND RULES
1. Email only - We’re not going to slug this out in the comments with crazy people dropping in crazy stuff and other people getting pissed off and replying. ANY COMMENT LEFT ON THIS POST THAT MAKES A CASE FOR OR AGAINST HELL WILL BE DELETED OR EDITED. ANY COMMENT THAT IS ABUSIVE OR DISRESPECTFUL OR FLIPPANT WILL BE DELETED OR EDITED. This is a serious inquiry, and I want those who respond, whatever they believe, to be treated with respect.
Make your case and send it to me by email. Send it to hell@RealLivePreacher.com. That email address will function while we’re engaging in this exercise.
2. New Testament only. You can’t drag verses from the Hebrew scriptures about Sheol into this discussion. Sheol isn’t hell. Even conservative scholars agree on that. If you are building a serious Christian theology, you have to use the New Testament.
3. You can’t base your argument on statements like "he will be cast into the outer darkness." You can use those kinds of statements to a certain extent, but you can’t build your whole case with them. You can’t get your ideas about hell from Paradise Lost and bad television, then read those ideas back into an ambiguous phrase that could mean all sorts of things. You need to make a good, solid New Testament case.
4. You may need to answer any opposing scriptures that I send back to you. If you send me one passage that seems to suggest something, and I email back 10 opposing passages that are clear and right from the mouth of Jesus, you have not made a good case.
5. Remember, you need to provide scriptural evidence for all three elements of hell.
a. You have to give scriptural evidence that hell exists.
b. You have to give scriptural evidence that it will be non-Christians who will end up there.
c. You have to give scriptural evidence that hell is forever.
I’ll tell you right now, b and c will be tough for you. And of all three, b is the most critical, in my opinion. Imagine how embarrassed you will be if you show us that your own scriptures say there is a literal hell, but you are the one going there for your lack of love, compassion, and care for the poor.
I’m just saying...
5. The last rule is for me. Serious responses will be treated with respect. I have no desire to laugh at anyone or poke fun. I’m in earnest. I want to know how you justify your beliefs. I will feel free to post anything that is sent to me, but I won’t use your name if you don’t want me to. If I’m not satisfied that you made a good case, I simply won’t post it. You’ll have to trust me on this.
Bring me your scriptures. I want to know the truth. I’ve been reading the New Testament, looking for the truth about hell. I’m still doing my study, but maybe you can help me. Serious cases made by a serious students of the New Testament will be posted here. And I’ll invite you to come by and converse with us in the comments if you like. Or if you wish to remain anonymous, that’s okay too.
I have my reasons for doing this. I think it’s high time we got this whole thing out in the open.
Real Live Preacher
Comments
What I DO NOT see spelled out
What I DO NOT see spelled out in our writing are the assumptions that are necessary to interpret the use of scripture, the use of the word "hell", the claim of something being a "tradition", the understanding of the nature of God, and the understanding of the authority of scripture. No conversation can be conducted without the delineation of such assumptions by you or anyone else. Without assumptions we have monologues that try to be dialogues, but end up leading to neither party hearing, much less understanding, the other. This too often ends in labeling (name calling) and all kinds of intellectual gymnatics. The worse part is it leaves no room for reconciliation, since the object of such discussion without owning assumptions is win - lose.
One of my assumptions is that what we have is WITNESS to what God, hopefully, has given us to understand about the Gospel (see Romans 12:3ff). Our witness must be joined with the witness of others in order to have a glimpse of the truth of God's Word and words. I'll leave my response with this asumption about God: God sees us not through human eyes nor by human standards and we are called to have the same sight through Jesus the Christ (see II Cor. 5:16ff.).
In this case I'm not trying
In this case I'm not trying to get at anything close to such a big truth. I'm simply asking a group of people to explain their beliefs according to their own methods. I want to know why my brother and sister evangelicals believe what they believe about hell. This is my spiritual family. Why do we believe these things? I've only asked them to show me their scriptures. And I've only asked that if they cannot, they spend a little time asking themselves what that means.
Well, I do appreciate your
Well, I do appreciate your reply. It clarified an important focus that I missed on my first reading.
I was reared in a similar tradition some 50 plus years ago. What I have learned along the way is that what we believe is based on our experiences (relational and scriptural) which create certain assumptions (which we often do not recognize or think about) which leads to our having conversations about biblical/theological sharings (witnesses) that may or may not come out of similar experiences and similar understandings of those experiences. Perhaps you and your brother and sister evangelicals have similar experiences and understandings of those experiences. Yet, if I believe what I read in scripture of how those writers sought to understand and express their encounter with God's mystery of faith and redemption and how they often expressed different understandings of similar experiences then I would want to hear of those underlying experiences to know that there is commmon understanding that would lead to dialogue.
Truth is a word that has become for me not an intellectual matter but a matter of my faith relationship with God and my faithfulness to that relationship as the Spirit nurtures and nourishes it.
I pray for you God's grace in receiving answers to your question and in your conversations with your evangelical brothers and sisters.
Grace and Peace,
Page
Gordon, You are a brave soul.
Gordon,
You are a brave soul. I think I would rather take a weekend hunting trip with Dick Cheney than stir this pot. I think I will watch this one from the cheap seats. I confess I am looking forward to the final conclusions. Should be a helluva time!
Yeah well, I often regret my
Yeah well, I often regret my actions. ;-) But the responses have been very polite and nice and respectful. This is good...I think.
I am curious what kind of
I am curious what kind of arguments will surface. And a bit scared for some random fundamentalist (of either pole) to declare war against you. Would it be good to give some examples of well thought arguments from different theologians, such as from the book Four Views on Hell? That might help people frame their arguments intelligibly and respectfully.
God bless you for taking this upon yourself; I agree it's high time this got out in the open.
Grace and Peace,
Thom Turner
http://www.everydayliturgy.com
I've had some fundamentalists
I've had some fundamentalists put me in their sights before. They have no power over me since I don't make a lot of money and am not clinging to a pulpit somewhere worried about getting fired. What can they do but send nasty emails? I'm just saying.
that said, it's no fun. I had a guy who was convinced I was an anti-Christ and a false prophet once. He plagued the comments and sent me a lot of email. I finally just deleted everything he did until he went away. I don't see that happening so much now. Too many crazy liberal bloggers out there for someone to attach themselves to just me.
Gordon, I keep checking to
Gordon, I keep checking to see what fruit this tree is bearing, and whether it's good or bad fruit. I'm also aware that my beliefs about hell are not simply what the Bible says. One, because I don't speak Greek. Two, because the issues of metaphorical language, and how much Jesus used language without necessarily buying into it cloud the biblical witness. I know some people will write this off who read it: I believe in hell because I've experienced it in relationships (Camus was right as well as wrong when he said "Hell is other people.") and in consequences of my choices. Have you run down the list of texts that accompany the article in New Hampshire Confession of Faith and others? I guess I also believe in hell or rather the awayness of God because I believe if you don't have a choice, it's not love. And we gotta be honest: if there's no hell, there may be no heaven. Anyway, I'll keep checking. Hope you get a lot of good grist for something.
I got a lot of response. I'm
I got a lot of response. I'm on retreat this week. Will collate and try to summarize and report next week. thanks John.
I'm not ready to tackle hell
I'm not ready to tackle hell right now. Maybe next year when I do an extended study of the Reformed theological heritage (in honor of Calvin's 500 year jubilee). But one thing I am continually forced to deal with (and find my own theology challenged by) is the complete lack of belief in any kind of an afterlife. It's just not something mainliners are comfortable with in Southern California... even at memorial services. I suspect that several things are involved, but I think the 2 most important are:
1. Universalism, i.e. nobody's going to hell because there's no such place... so why talk about heaven?
2. Denial of death: With facelifts, work-outs, hair transplants, and converibles, we are encouraged to live our lives as though we're eternally 29. Since we deny that we ourselves are getting older, we fail to appreciate the wisdom that comes with age, thriving instead on perpetual innovation. And if we refuse to think about the blessing of age, then the end of life and what happens after we die are simply pushed from the agenda as something we no longer have time for.
Is the rest of the country like this yet? If not, then perhaps the you should all start getting ready. Remember Proposition 13? What starts in California generally spreads.
I preached a sermon on hell
I preached a sermon on hell recently. The parable of the wheat and the tares was my text:
http://marvinlindsay.typepad.com/avdat/2008/07/no-till-farming.html
But I'm not down with the three criteria. Sorry if this is off-topic.
I'm not down with the
I'm not down with the criteria either, but remember this is getting them to play by the rules they set up. Sola scriptura and all that. And wouldn't such a terrible thing as hell HAVE to be clear in the New Testament? You'd need scripture and tradition and right reason all three before you'd even consider such a thing.
I just want to see what people send me.
Gordon, This is a most
Gordon,
This is a most interesting challenge, and as others have pointed out, fraught with danger. I won't be participating in the study, because I long ago gave up the idea -- it might have it's play in Scripture but didn't seem to fit the nature of God. So, I gave it up long before I became a liberal! While I was still a student at Fuller. Still, I've never figured out the attraction of the doctrine!
Bob Cornwall